Re: removing NATM netnatm

[Ryota Ozaki <ozaki-r%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 5:32 AM, Tyler Retzlaff <rtr%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:
> hi,
>
> just soliciting opinions for removal of NATM (sys/netnatm).
>
> it has been bitrotting away for what looks like years, never
> gets compiled (not even by ALL kernels) and given its condition
> I doubt it is used by anyone anywhere.
>
> is there a process to be followed for removing it?  is there a
> reason to keep it around?

No objection means ok to remove? :)


BTW I want to raise arcnet to this what-to-be-removed topic.
It also seems to be not used for long years (see my latest commit).

# I wanted to add netnatm too though, it seems to be used yet, isn't it?

  ozaki-r