tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

should inetd require rpcbind?

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: should inetd require rpcbind?
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:27:21 +0200

When RPC-based entries are enabled, inetd must be started after rpcbind.

Currently, this seems to happen by chance because inetd REQUIREs DAEMON, 
and nfslocking is BEFORE: DAEMON and REQUIREs nfsd, which, in turn REQUIREs 
rpcbind.

So, should inetd directly REQUIRE rpcbind?
Should nfslocking also explicitly REQUIRE rpcbind?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: should inetd require rpcbind?
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: should inetd require rpcbind?
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: should inetd require rpcbind?
  - From: Michael Richardson

Prev by Date: FW: [tcpdump-workers] Modular arithmetic
Next by Date: Re: should inetd require rpcbind?
Previous by Thread: FW: [tcpdump-workers] Modular arithmetic
Next by Thread: Re: should inetd require rpcbind?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index