tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: removing carp(4)

David Young wrote:
> Do people think that it works well enough to replace carp(4)?

By how much a packet can be delayed without causing a failover?  Is it
1/256 of a second? Can the kernel guarantee that a process can process
a packet within that limit regardless of how busy the box is?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index