[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: How usable is agr(4)?
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> while upgrading a busy nfs fileserver, I have changed it to aggregate
> two wm(4) GBit interfaces with agr(4); on the other end is a HP procurve
> 2848 switch.
> After a few days, a 'netstat -i' gives me
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> wm0 1500 <Link> 00:30:48:d7:0a:78 349626955 23 338123451 0
> wm1 1500 <Link> 00:30:48:d7:0a:79 7958 0 7955 0 > 0
> agr0 1500 <Link> 00:30:48:d7:0a:78 349620694 16 338117217
> 3516 2
> which is not really balanced. Is this what I should expect? Or what am I
The balance is done based on a hash of the source and destination
MAC addresses. So if your traffic is going though a router, you won't have
load-balancing. If the clients are local (and there's enough of them)
I would expect it to work.
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |