tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: v6 vs gif

> Non /64 prefix lengths is contrary to du jure standard for prefixes
> in 2000::/3.  (rfc4291 section 2.5.4)

Oh, ouch.  That's just insane.  That certainly will be one RFC I'll be
ignoring (well, that I'll continue to ignore).  Didn't the v6 people
learn _anything_ from the breakdown of v4 address classes?!

> De facto reality is a completely different matter.  There is a
> notable amount of operational resistence to /64 on p2p links.

What would it even _mean_?

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML      
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index