Re: RFC1393?

[Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 12:37:41AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> 1393 is an experimental protcol which wouldn't even get that far if
> it were being proposed now (rather than 15 years ago when no-one much
> cared about things like amplification attacks).
> 
> Just forget it.

After reading it: I agree. While it is not necessarily a bad idea, 
making the address to send the answer to different from the source
address of the header is asking for trouble.

        -is