tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.

To: tech-net%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.
From: christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:47:01 +0000 (UTC)

In article <20080109181955.GA8101952%qnx.com@localhost>,
Sean Boudreau  <seanb%qnx.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
>> Is there a reason not to call it "proxy"?
>> 
>> christos
>
>Other than historical none that I can see.  We
>can document "proxy" but continue to match on
>"pro" in the code?

That is an excellent idea.

christos

References:
- arp(8) and proxy only entries.
  - From: Sean Boudreau
- Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.
  - From: Sean Boudreau

Prev by Date: Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.
Next by Date: Re: MPLS patches
Previous by Thread: Re: arp(8) and proxy only entries.
Next by Thread: Revamping optimised in_cksum/in4_cksum/in6_cksum support
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index