> On 4. Aug 2023, at 21:48, Jaromír Doleček <jaromir.dolecek%gmail.com@localhost> wrote: <snip> > In a broader view, I have doubts if there is any practical reason to > even have support for bigger than 64kb block size support at all. Having tapes with record size > 64k would be a real benefit though. -- J. Hannken-Illjes - hannken%mailbox.org@localhost
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP