Re: svr4, again

[Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>]

Agreed.  I think they (especially osf1) should go, but new thread warranted.

-- thorpej
Sent from my iPhone.

> On Mar 9, 2019, at 4:38 AM, Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost> wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
>> Re-reading this thread - which was initially about SVR4 but which diverged in
>> all directions -, I see there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULTRIX and
>> COMPAT_OSF1, because these were of questionable utility, in addition to being
>> clear dead wood (in terms of use case, commits in these areas, and ability to
>> test changes).
>> 
>> Does anyone have anything to say?
> 
> Possibly, although I doubt they'll notice they want to say something in
> this thread with the current Subject line...  I'd suggest starting a
> new thread, possibly CCing port-pmax@ and port-alpha@ as relevant.
> 
>    Jonathan Kollasch