tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: svr4, again

To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>, Johnny Billquist <bqt%softjar.se@localhost>
Subject: Re: svr4, again
From: Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 11:28:05 +0100

Re-reading this thread - which was initially about SVR4 but which diverged in
all directions -, I see there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULTRIX and
COMPAT_OSF1, because these were of questionable utility, in addition to being
clear dead wood (in terms of use case, commits in these areas, and ability to
test changes).

Does anyone have anything to say?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: svr4, again
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: svr4, again
  - From: Jonathan A. Kollasch

References:
- Re: svr4, again
  - From: Brian Buhrow
- Re: svr4, again
  - From: Johnny Billquist
- Re: svr4, again
  - From: Jason Thorpe

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: New userspace fetch/store API
Next by Date: Re: svr4, again
Previous by Thread: Re: svr4, again
Next by Thread: Re: svr4, again
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index