Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
From: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 21:37:03 -0000 (UTC)

mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost (Mouse) writes:

>So, what type _should_ be used for it?

double

or not.

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."

References:
- Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Michael van Elst
- Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Michał Górny
- Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
  - From: Mouse

Prev by Date: Re: Adding new feature - Kcov
Next by Date: Re: Adding new feature - Kcov
Previous by Thread: Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
Next by Thread: Re: Support for tv_sec=-1 (one second before the epoch) timestamps?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index