Hi,does this panic (with -current/amd64 as of 20171221) ring a bell with anyone?
shortly after starting mrouted and ntpd:panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "IFNET_LOCKED(ifp)" failed: file "/src/NetBSD/cur/src/sys/net/if.c", line 3602
fatal breakpoint trap in supervisor modetrap type 1 code 0 rip 0xffffffff8021d2d5 cs 0x8 rflags 0x246 cr2 0xffff80013dd84000 ilevel 0 rsp 0xffffe4013bb5aae0
curlwp 0xffffe404743f15c0 pid 916.1 lowest kstack 0xffffe4013bb572c0 Stopped in pid 916.1 (mrouted) at netbsd:breakpoint+0x5: leave db{3}> bt breakpoint() at netbsd:breakpoint+0x5 vpanic() at netbsd:vpanic+0x140 ch_voltag_convert_in() at netbsd:ch_voltag_convert_in if_mcast_op() at netbsd:if_mcast_op+0xb3 ip_mrouter_set() at netbsd:ip_mrouter_set+0xdef rip_ctloutput() at netbsd:rip_ctloutput+0x11f rip_ctloutput_wrapper() at netbsd:rip_ctloutput_wrapper+0x2c sosetopt() at netbsd:sosetopt+0x67 sys_setsockopt() at netbsd:sys_setsockopt+0x91 syscall() at netbsd:syscall+0x235 Best regards, Frank On 12/19/17 09:21, Ryota Ozaki wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Nick Hudson <nick.hudson%gmx.co.uk@localhost> wrote:On 19/12/2017 03:43, Ryota Ozaki wrote:BTW I committed a change that disables IFEF_MPSAFE by default on all interfaces because it seems that IFEF_MPSAFE requires additional changes to work safely with it. We should enable it by default if an interface is guaranteed to be safe.What additional changes?For example, avoid updating if_flags (and reading it and depending on the result) in Tx/Rx paths and using if_watchdog. ozaki-r