Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]

To: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki.ryota%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
From: Nick Hudson <nick.hudson%gmx.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 07:52:00 +0000

On 19/12/2017 03:43, Ryota Ozaki wrote:

BTW I committed a change that disables IFEF_MPSAFE by default on
all interfaces because it seems that IFEF_MPSAFE requires additional
changes to work safely with it. We should enable it by default if an
interface is guaranteed to be safe.

What additional changes?

Thanks,
Nick

Follow-Ups:
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Ryota Ozaki

References:
- IFEF_MPSAFE
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: IFEF_MPSAFE
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: IFEF_MPSAFE
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Nick Hudson
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Nick Hudson
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Ryota Ozaki
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Nick Hudson
- Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
  - From: Ryota Ozaki

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: ipsec(4) pseudo interface
Next by Date: Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
Previous by Thread: Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
Next by Thread: Re: struct ifnet locking [was Re: IFEF_MPSAFE]
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index