tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RFC: PERCPU_LIST to fix PR kern/52515
> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 05:21:58 +0000
> From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-kern%mumble.net@localhost>
>
> I dropped this thread on the floor a while ago and I forget what the
> status was. I've had a patch sitting in my tree for a while which I
> brushed off to put the list update logic in separate functions, as I
> think chuq requested a while ago, but still keep it all isolated to
> subr_psref.c and avoid defining any new macros.
...One of these days, I will teach the computer to remind me when I
didn't attach the patch I mentioned.
Index: sys/kern/subr_psref.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/kern/subr_psref.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -p -u -r1.7 subr_psref.c
--- sys/kern/subr_psref.c 1 Jun 2017 02:45:13 -0000 1.7
+++ sys/kern/subr_psref.c 7 Dec 2017 05:12:44 -0000
@@ -78,12 +78,129 @@ __KERNEL_RCSID(0, "$NetBSD: subr_psref.c
#include <sys/queue.h>
#include <sys/xcall.h>
-LIST_HEAD(psref_head, psref);
-
static bool _psref_held(const struct psref_target *, struct psref_class *,
bool);
/*
+ * struct psref_head
+ *
+ * Head of a list of psrefs.
+ *
+ * We use a custom list data structure here in which the first
+ * element of the list has a null prevp, instead of a prevp
+ * pointing at the list head. We must do this because the list
+ * head can migrate in memory due to percpu_alloc.
+ *
+ * Avoiding the back-pointer into the head further requires
+ * passing the head to psref_list_remove. We can't use _any_ of
+ * the existing LIST_* because we can't distinguish which prevp
+ * points at the head with them. So we can't even partly use the
+ * LIST_* macros with a kludge.
+ *
+ * This structure is of limited utility, so it is restricted to
+ * this file for now.
+ */
+struct psref_head {
+ struct psref *prh_first;
+};
+
+/*
+ * PSREF_LIST_FOREACH(psref, head)
+ *
+ * Loop header for iterating over the list of psrefs starting at
+ * head.
+ */
+#define PSREF_LIST_FOREACH(PSREF, HEAD) \
+ for ((PSREF) = (HEAD)->prh_first; \
+ (PSREF) != NULL; \
+ (PSREF) = (PSREF)->psref_next)
+
+/*
+ * psref_list_empty(head)
+ *
+ * True iff the list of psrefs starting at head is empty.
+ */
+static inline bool
+psref_list_empty(const struct psref_head *head)
+{
+
+ return head->prh_first == NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * psref_list_insert_head(head, psref)
+ *
+ * Insert psref at the front of the list starting at head.
+ */
+static inline void
+psref_list_insert_head(struct psref_head *head, struct psref *psref)
+{
+
+ KASSERTMSG((head->prh_first == NULL ||
+ head->prh_first->psref_prevp == NULL),
+ "psref_head %p [cpu%d] psref %p prevp is %p, not null",
+ head, cpu_index(curcpu()), head->prh_first,
+ head->prh_first->psref_prevp);
+
+ /*
+ * Set the next element of our new element to whatever the
+ * first element is, if there is one, and if there is one, set
+ * its previous pointer to point at our new element.
+ */
+ if ((psref->psref_next = head->prh_first) != NULL)
+ psref->psref_next->psref_prevp = &psref->psref_next;
+
+ /* Mark the new element as the first in the list. */
+ psref->psref_prevp = NULL;
+
+ /* Publish. */
+ head->prh_first = psref;
+}
+
+/*
+ * psref_list_remove(head, psref)
+ *
+ * Remove psref from the list it is on, which must start at head.
+ */
+static inline void
+psref_list_remove(struct psref_head *head, struct psref *psref)
+{
+
+ /*
+ * Either the previous pointer, if there is one, or the list
+ * head, if there isn't because we're at the head of the list,
+ * had better point at this psref. If this is not at the head
+ * of the list, the head of the list had better *not* point at
+ * this psref.
+ */
+ KASSERTMSG(psref->psref_prevp == NULL || *psref->psref_prevp == psref,
+ "psref %p prevp %p points at %p",
+ psref, psref->psref_prevp, *psref->psref_prevp);
+ KASSERTMSG((psref->psref_prevp == NULL) == (head->prh_first == psref),
+ "psref %p prevp %p psref_head %p [cpu%d] first is %p",
+ psref, psref->psref_prevp, head, cpu_index(curcpu()),
+ head->prh_first);
+
+ /* If there is a next element, set its previous pointer to ours. */
+ if (psref->psref_next != NULL)
+ psref->psref_next->psref_prevp = psref->psref_prevp;
+
+ /*
+ * If it's at the head of the list, we must modify the head
+ * explicitly. We can't have psref->psref_prevp be a
+ * back-pointer into the head because percpu_alloc may move the
+ * per-CPU objects around in memory, which would invalidate
+ * that back-pointer.
+ */
+ if (psref->psref_prevp == NULL)
+ head->prh_first = psref->psref_next;
+
+ /* Paranoia: poison this element so it can no longer be used. */
+ psref->psref_prevp = (void *)1; /* poison */
+ psref->psref_next = (void *)2; /* poison */
+}
+
+/*
* struct psref_class
*
* Private global state for a class of passive reference targets.
@@ -135,7 +252,7 @@ psref_cpu_drained_p(void *p, void *cooki
const struct psref_cpu *pcpu = p;
bool *retp = cookie;
- if (!LIST_EMPTY(&pcpu->pcpu_head))
+ if (!psref_list_empty(&pcpu->pcpu_head))
*retp = false;
}
@@ -194,7 +311,7 @@ psref_check_duplication(struct psref_cpu
bool found = false;
struct psref *_psref;
- LIST_FOREACH(_psref, &pcpu->pcpu_head, psref_entry) {
+ PSREF_LIST_FOREACH(_psref, &pcpu->pcpu_head) {
if (_psref == psref &&
_psref->psref_target == target) {
found = true;
@@ -250,7 +367,7 @@ psref_acquire(struct psref *psref, const
#endif
/* Record our reference. */
- LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&pcpu->pcpu_head, psref, psref_entry);
+ psref_list_insert_head(&pcpu->pcpu_head, psref);
psref->psref_target = target;
psref->psref_lwp = curlwp;
psref->psref_cpu = curcpu();
@@ -273,6 +390,7 @@ void
psref_release(struct psref *psref, const struct psref_target *target,
struct psref_class *class)
{
+ struct psref_cpu *pcpu;
int s;
KASSERTMSG((kpreempt_disabled() || cpu_softintr_p() ||
@@ -297,12 +415,12 @@ psref_release(struct psref *psref, const
/*
* Block interrupts and remove the psref from the current CPU's
- * list. No need to percpu_getref or get the head of the list,
- * and the caller guarantees that we are bound to a CPU anyway
- * (as does blocking interrupts).
+ * list.
*/
s = splraiseipl(class->prc_iplcookie);
- LIST_REMOVE(psref, psref_entry);
+ pcpu = percpu_getref(class->prc_percpu);
+ psref_list_remove(&pcpu->pcpu_head, psref);
+ percpu_putref(class->prc_percpu);
splx(s);
/* If someone is waiting for users to drain, notify 'em. */
@@ -353,7 +471,7 @@ psref_copy(struct psref *pto, const stru
pcpu = percpu_getref(class->prc_percpu);
/* Record the new reference. */
- LIST_INSERT_HEAD(&pcpu->pcpu_head, pto, psref_entry);
+ psref_list_insert_head(&pcpu->pcpu_head, pto);
pto->psref_target = pfrom->psref_target;
pto->psref_lwp = curlwp;
pto->psref_cpu = curcpu();
@@ -474,7 +592,7 @@ _psref_held(const struct psref_target *t
pcpu = percpu_getref(class->prc_percpu);
/* Search through all the references on this CPU. */
- LIST_FOREACH(psref, &pcpu->pcpu_head, psref_entry) {
+ PSREF_LIST_FOREACH(psref, &pcpu->pcpu_head) {
/* Sanity-check the reference's CPU. */
KASSERTMSG((psref->psref_cpu == curcpu()),
"passive reference transferred from CPU %u to CPU %u",
Index: sys/sys/psref.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/sys/sys/psref.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -p -u -r1.2 psref.h
--- sys/sys/psref.h 16 Dec 2016 20:12:11 -0000 1.2
+++ sys/sys/psref.h 7 Dec 2017 05:12:44 -0000
@@ -69,7 +69,8 @@ struct psref_target {
* written only on the local CPU.
*/
struct psref {
- LIST_ENTRY(psref) psref_entry;
+ struct psref *psref_next;
+ struct psref **psref_prevp;
const struct psref_target *psref_target;
struct lwp *psref_lwp;
struct cpu_info *psref_cpu;
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index