Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys

To: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:43:05 +0700

    Date:        Thu, 23 Feb 2017 23:57:36 +0100
    From:        Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
    Message-ID:  <de274757-0e63-cf18-7f8e-d3c279ee6c3a%gmx.com@localhost>

  | My bump was still legitimate as I changed size of amd64 and i386 struct
  | lwp - I removed one MD field.

Yes, I agree, and said that in my first message in this thread, before
it mprphed into a more general "when are kernel version bumps needed"
discussion.

kre

References:
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
Previous by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
Next by Thread: re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index