tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1

To: dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost (David Holland)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 21:10:40 +0200

David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote:

> ...however, with a dead nfs server even sync() should time out and
> fail eventually.

The problem is that you can ask VFS_SYNC(9) to wait or not, but there is
no such option for sync(2). 

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
  - From: Chuck Silvers

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: rm(1) CPU hog
Next by Date: Re: rm(1) CPU hog
Previous by Thread: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
Next by Thread: Re: [PATCH] Fixing soft NFS umount -f, round 1
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index