Re: x96 cannot build without MULTIPROCESSOR

[manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)]

Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:

> > Then it should not be an option.
> It is a real option on some other architecturs, so this gets tricky.

At least it should be documented as such: options(4) can note it is
implicit x86 and whatever other architectures.

Then MULTIPROCESSOR can be set by a #define on x86, and config(1) can be
modified to reject the option as deprecated on x86.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost