Re: RFC: IRQ affinity (aka interrupt routing)

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 07:35:21PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote:
> 
> Currently intrctl use "14" for both 'ioapic0' and 'ioapic1', this is
> a bug...
> I fix it as intrctl use "14" for 'ioapic0' on the other hand "38" for
> 'ioapic1'. "38" for 'ioapic1' is defined following

I think this is extremely counterintuitive.  I think strings should be
used in this interface.

Thor