Re: PUFFS_VN_LOOKUP2

To: yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
Subject: Re: PUFFS_VN_LOOKUP2
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:52:26 +0200

YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost> wrote:

> can't you make TTL optional without versioning OPs?
> eg. making the reply variable-sized.

Here is a first attempt:
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/kernel.patch
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/libpuffs.patch
http://ftp.espci.fr/shadow/manu/libperfuse.patch

I am currently running tests with it. Performances are much better, and
indeed traces show many less LOOKUPs.

Any comment? Is it good enough to commit?

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: PUFFS_VN_LOOKUP2
  - From: YAMAMOTO Takashi

Prev by Date: Re:
Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/tests/modules
Previous by Thread: Re: PUFFS_VN_LOOKUP2
Next by Thread: Finding the syscall number in a crash dump for a given process?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index