Re: updated patch Re: buffer cache & ufs changes (preliminary ffsv2 extattr support)

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:24:36AM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > It is also moot. Provided that quota cleanup leaves me with enough
 > > time to merge and test (admittedly this is looking less and less
 > > likely), the ufs/lfs split will be in -6.
 > > 
 > > (unlike the changes proposed in this thread, the ufs/lfs split has
 > > been in the works a long time and has been discussed with releng.)
 > 
 > You've been talking about it for some time, but I've never seen details
 > or patch about it on a  public list.

Perhaps it's been so long that you've forgotten?

 > I couldn't find references to it in the releng mail archives
 > either.

That's because I've been talking with specific people about it.

Anyhow, it's moot. The minimum necessary quota fixes are not, at this
point, going to leave me time to get my lfs tree merged, let alone
tested and running again, before the deadline.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost