Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> > I'm trying to modularize a couple of drivers, and one of them is
> > generating some gcc errors due to comparison of signed and unsigned
> > values.
> >
> > The driver module is currently being compiled with WARNS=4 (just picked
> > that up from another Makefile).  Is there a more appropriate WARNS=n to
> > use to permit the comparison?  Or should I simply add
> >
> >         CCOPTS+= -Wno-sign-compare
> >
> > (which is used when the driver is being compiled as part of a kernel)?
>
> It is best to fix the errors.

Yeah, OK!   :)

Fixing, will commit shortly.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette     | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:       |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com    |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------