tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Unsafe GENERIC? - Re: (unknown)

Paul Goyette <> writes:

> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>> Well... Could we arrange it so that we have safe monolithic GENERIC
>> until issues are resolved somehow?
> For i386, use MONOLITHIC instad of GENERIC
> For amd64, the default is still MONOLITHIC, if I remember correctly.

This produces unnecessary confusion and nothing more.

Update procedure becomes more machine-dependent.
Even on commodity hardware, where some users prefer to stay with i386
because of e.g. WINE and other 32-bit only software.


Attachment: pgplBuV7yeZSJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index