Hi folks, On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 08:06:57PM +0200, Adam Hamsik wrote: > >Certainly you are welcome to fix LFS! Who is stopping you? > > From current state of LFS code it is probably not possible to easily > fix it > and probably full rewrite is needed. Which is probably a lot harder > than end > ZFS port. I've started a rewrite of LFS, well of niLFS2 rather. Its a replacement FS for LFS with checkpoints and persistent snapshotting; pitty the origional is written by NTT for Linux and GPL'd so i had to start from scratch anyway. I've finished a read-only kernel implementation for some time now and am now working on a newfs_nilfs and hopefully start on kernel nilfs2 write support soon though prolly not withing the next two weeks due to `real life' ;) With regards, Reinoud
Attachment:
pgpwI2oXuvlD3.pgp
Description: PGP signature