Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

> > a) apply the workaround to all m68k ports:
> >  pros: same m68k binaries can be shared
> >  cons: requires extra performance penalty for all m68k (020/030/040/060)
> > 
> > b) apply the workaround only for XC68LC040 users:
> >  pros: nothing? (only technical interests of developers?)
> >  cons: more extra overhead than softfloat binaries

 :

> Its for the first time in 32 years this has been fixed...... All of these 
> options were in PR 13078 which I read and reopened and wrote the fix as 
> proposed in the PR for gas(1).
> 
> Now that this has been fixed it raises the possibility of supporting all m68k 
> (even buggy XC68LC040) cpus.....AND THATS THE POINT!!!

You are ignoring cons of your options.

Please ask m68k users first, if it's acceptable or not.

---
Izumi TSutsui