Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k

To: Nat Sloss <nathanialsloss%yahoo.com.au@localhost>
Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 15:06:57 +0200

On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:47:39PM +1100, Nat Sloss wrote:
> nop
> fnop
> 
> could be executed as
> 
> nop
> (context swtich)
> (return from context swtich)
> fnop
> 
> So without these the fnop would not be coverted.

Not sure what you mean here.

Why would the nop before the rte make any difference in this flow of
instructions?

Martin

References:
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
  - From: Nat Sloss
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
  - From: Nat Sloss

Prev by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
Next by Date: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
Previous by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/m68k/m68k
Next by Thread: Re: CVS commit: src
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index