> On Feb 17, 2021, at 4:20 PM, Valery Ushakov <uwe%stderr.spb.ru@localhost> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 17:49:15 -0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: > > This incrementally improves wrong things b/c you still have the "is > aligned" and "ought to be aligned" conflated in one. The incremental patch improves things and does not make things worse. I will address the __NO_STRICT_ALIGNMENT issue separately. I am planning to propose something in tech-kern once I have it working to my liking. This patch helps me because it aligns the semantics of the two macros better. christos
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP