On 29.02.2020 22:29, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 29.02.2020 21:58, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:36:00PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> On 29.02.2020 19:00, Taylor R Campbell wrote: >>>>> Module Name: src >>>>> Committed By: kamil >>>>> Date: Sat Feb 29 04:27:01 UTC 2020 >>>>> >>>>> Modified Files: >>>>> src/doc: CHANGES >>>>> >>>>> Log Message: >>>>> ld.elf_so(1): Implement DT_GNU_HASH >>>> >>>> Was this discussed anywhere? >>> >>> In the toolchain circles, for some time now (2+ years). >>> >>> It was one of the pending task to modernize our ELF loader on par with >>> at least FreeBSD. >> >> Can we please stop with this "we must need XXX to be on par with YYY" Speaking of what. We are still waiting for over a year now for multisegment support in the ELF loader. We can barely build a functional binary with a patched lld. Can we get at least architectural design what is the proper direction here (we received no feedback) so we can do it on our own?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature