Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 09:09:40PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> I recently told membership-exec that I would be less outspoken, and more
> convivial, so here's a try:
> 
> Le 22/04/2018 à 20:51, Joerg Sonnenberger a écrit :
> > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 12:36:36PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> > > Where are they? I haven't been made aware of any issue related to SVS+clang.
> > 
> > Yes, I did make you aware that SVS killed VirtualBox.
> 
> You are being dishonest. You did tell me that SVS didn't work with your
> VirtualBox. At no point in time did you tell me that it was related to clang
> or anything close to being a compiler issue, and not an implementation
> issue.

I didn't claim that now either. All I said is that SVS was known to be
broken in my environment. Understanding the issue took a while as
reproduction was annoying given that people continued to break the LLVM
build every other day, so it was hard to use official images for testing. 

> In fact, if you want my point of view, you reported your "problem" in a way
> that made me just unable to understand what it was about. I had to ask you
> repeatedly, question after question, what is your virtualbox, what is your
> cpu, is it hw-assisted, and so on.

Shockingly, I would have included more data if I know whether any of the
parameters are relevant. I originally ruled out LLVM since I thought it
worked on a different (physical) machine. No longer sure I did, given
that the machine is not supposed to use SVS for the obvious performance
implications.

Joerg