Source-Changes-D archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: src/share/mk
> > OTOH you can't pass parameters to ${CC}, because in suffix rules make(1)
> > only
> > knows the name of ${.IMPSRC} and ${.TARGET}
>
> Actually it would do no harm for bsd.prog.mk (IIRC) to define an
> explicit dependency when it generates ${OBJS} from ${SRCS}.
> Make will use the rules from the appropriate suffix rule, but
> it will force the specific dependency.
>
> So if SRCS contains foo.c the will be built, even if there is a foo.S
I was unclear; I meant "you can't pass per-target (${PROG} / ${LIB}) parameters
to ${CC} directly".
And yes, it's actually possible to append ${CPPFLAGS.foo} to
${CPPFLAGS.foo_src_a.c}, ${CPPFLAGS.foo_src_b.c}, ... by using .for. I don't
think that is worth bothering. I can also think of odd situations where you
share one source among multiple targets:
PROGS=foo bar
SRCS.foo=foo.c common.c
SRCS.bar=bar.c common.c
CPPFLAGS.foo=-Dfoo
CPPFLAGS.bar=-Dbar
Think how common.o will be built...
Masao
--
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index