Source-Changes-D archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: CVS commit: src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist



On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:19:32AM +0000, Nick Hudson wrote:
> Module Name:  src
> Committed By: skrll
> Date:         Wed Aug 19 07:19:32 UTC 2009
> 
> Modified Files:
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist: config.sub
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd: archive.c bfd-in2.h bfd.c
>           coff-alpha.c config.bfd configure configure.host configure.in
>           elf32-i386.c elf32-vax.c elf64-alpha.c elflink.c libbfd.h reloc.c
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/bfd/doc: Makefile.in bfdt.texi
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/binutils: ar.c bucomm.c objcopy.c
>           strings.c
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/binutils/doc: Makefile.am Makefile.in
>           ar.1 binutils.texi
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/gas/config: tc-vax.c tc-vax.h
>           vax-inst.h
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/gas/doc: Makefile.am Makefile.in
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/gprof: corefile.c gprof.c
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/include: bfdlink.h
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/ld: Makefile.am Makefile.in
>           configure.host configure.tgt ld.texinfo ldmain.c ldmain.h lexsup.c
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/ld/emulparams: armelf_nbsd.sh
>           elf32_sparc.sh elf64alpha_nbsd.sh elf_i386.sh hppalinux.sh
>           hppaobsd.sh m68kelf.sh m68kelfnbsd.sh sh.sh shelf_nbsd.sh
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/ld/emultempl: elf32.em
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/ld/scripttempl: sh.sc
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/libiberty: strerror.c
>       src/external/gpl3/binutils/dist/opcodes: Makefile.am Makefile.in
>           cgen.sh configure configure.in sparc-dis.c
> 
> Log Message:
> Merge changes to binutils 2.16.1 in src/gnu/dist/binutils into 2.19.1.

Many of them look like they might be relevant for upstream, is someone
feeding them back?

I also noticed some sh5 support, do we want to keep this now that the
port has been obsoleted?
 Thomas


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index