On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 04:24:07PM +0100, Robert Swindells wrote: > > Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote: > >On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 14:18:16 +0000, Christoph Egger wrote: > > >> struct device * -> device_t, no functional changes intended. > > >Why don't you cmp(1) the objects before and after to verify that? > >"Same object code generated" is, unlike intentions, something that can > >be verified. > > A fair number won't be the same, I would guess half our SCSI drivers > are currently broken. > > Do a search in sys/dev/ic for 'adapt_dev', any driver that casts this > to a softc instead of calling device_private() will crash. As much as I dislike the way cegger does those changes, that's simply not true. -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "See the look on my face from staying too long in one place [...] every time the morning breaks I know I'm closer to falling" KT Tunstall, Saving My Face, Drastic Fantastic, 2007.
Attachment:
pgpt2hu5xjmbm.pgp
Description: PGP signature