Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/ptyfs

[yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi)]

> On Mar 23, 12:52am, yamt%mwd.biglobe.ne.jp@localhost (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/fs/ptyfs
> 
> | hi,
> | 
> | > Module Name:      src
> | > Committed By:     christos
> | > Date:             Sun Mar 15 16:43:55 UTC 2009
> | > 
> | > Modified Files:
> | >   src/sys/fs/ptyfs: ptyfs.h ptyfs_vfsops.c
> | > 
> | > Log Message:
> | > Add a chroot flag, so that ptyfs can be mounted in a chrooted environment.
> | > XXX: This is a hack, in reality we should allow multiple ptyfs mounts.
> | 
> | why does this need to be a mount flag?
> | 
> | YAMAMOTO Takashi
> 
> How else you could select either behavior?

probably i'm missing something obvious.
i don't understand why you need to have two different behaviours.
the chroot one can't work for the non-chroot case?

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> 
> christos