Re: New Vax - future directions :-)

[Toby Thain <toby%telegraphics.com.au@localhost>]

On 2021-07-03 11:09 a.m., Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 7/3/21 10:01 AM, Rhialto wrote:
>>> The JMP/JSR/RET/... might need a Q counterpart, since it suddenly
>>> store/require 8 bytes instead of 4.
>>
>> I now know the perfect name for this architecture: VAQX!
> 
>   It could still be pronounced roughly the same.. ;)

Isn't that an anti-goal?

I suggest: QUAX

> 
>            -Dave
>