Port-sparc archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: SparcStation IPC: Data Access Exception
On Nov 25, 2014, at 08:04, Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
>> The other thing that sparc firmware is picky about is the block/frag sizes f$
>
> That's weird. Do you have any idea what the mechanism for that is? I thought the firmware was used only as a dumb "read this block” driver, and I have trouble imagining how that could care about filesystem frag or block size.
Block size exceeds expected/allocated buffer size, perhaps?
We now do things with these old systems that were not expected or insanely expensive when they were designed/built. A terabyte of disk for USD$50?
The other thing I’d try if the boot problem persists: zero the first part of the disk before install, i.e.
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rsd0c bs=1m count=1
I’ve had this measure to ensure tabula rasa make the difference between inexplicable failure and boot success with sparcs - my uninvestigated presumption is the NetBSD installation procedure doesn’t always stomp completely on what was there before, and remnants can leave a mess the firmware doesn’t like.
Our lot in having to deal with the quirks and vagaries of extant system firmware that we can’t change is not a happy one. Worse, as a subsystem that is seldom used and not generally “user visible”, the Q/A and implementation quality of system firmware tends to be “just enough to get the system to boot” rather than as fully robust as we might prefer.
Erik <fair%netbsd.org@localhost>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index