Re: A couple of suggestions

[Derek God3 <derek0godfrey%netscape.net@localhost>]

Whilst we are on it, it would nice if "BOARDTYPE" were more visible
to the build.sh process. Why should my port/board's etc/etc.evbppc/*
distrib/evbppc/*, fdisk or disklabel be the same as somebody else's?
Perhaps subdirectories there would be more manageable - if only
BOARDTYPE were more visible.

-Derek

briggs%wasabisystems.com@localhost wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:37:17PM -0500, Allen Briggs wrote:
>
> > > or CPPFLAGS+=-D__${MACHINE}__
> >
> > I like this.  We already define __${BOARDTYPE}__ right now.  I'll poke
> > around and try to see where we currently use ${MACHINE} and fix them.
> > The only one that I can think of off-hand is sys/arch/isa/fd.c.
>
>
> Actually, after finding a couple of occurrences in sys/dev, I think
> it would be best to maintain consistency with the other ports that
> define ${MACHINE} and use 
>
> CPPFLAGS+=-D${MACHINE}=${MACHINE}
>
> instead.
>
> -allen