Port-powerpc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

possible bug in gdb

To: port-powerpc <port-powerpc%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: possible bug in gdb
From: Derek Godfrey <derek0godfrey%netscape.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:44:54 -0800

ok it seems gcc 2.95 is not good. so what of gdb?

even gdb-5.3 does not support back traces across signal handlers on ppcnetbsd.

I have some better code but I'm not there yet. The offsets in rs6000_tdep.c

do not match the trampline14 code - but it seems there is more to thisproblem

than just that.

dje%watson.ibm.com@localhost wrote:

   Upgrade to a newer version of GCC.  This is a known problem in GCC

2.95.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: possible bug in gdb
  - From: Jason Thorpe

References:
- Re: possible bug in gcc
  - From: David Edelsohn

Prev by Date: re: possible bug in gcc
Next by Date: re: possible bug in gcc
Previous by Thread: re: possible bug in gcc
Next by Thread: Re: possible bug in gdb
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index