Port-macppc archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Network problem...



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Feb 4, 2008, at 05:26, Niels S. Eliasen wrote:

After having upgraded to NetBSD 4.0, from a mix of 3.1 kernel and 2.x userland, I now have a trusty PowerBook 3500 running fairly smoothly...

I do however have a performance problem with the Belkin network PCCARD, which is Accton based... (Besides I am using the lower of the two PCCARD slots, as I believe it is the only one that is useable...)

and from dmesg:
rtk0 at cardbus0 function 0: Accton MPX 5030/5038 10/100BaseTX
rtk0: Ethernet address 00:30:bd:11:51:85
rlphy0 at rtk0 phy 7: Realtek internal PHY
rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto


ifconfig rtk0
rtk0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        address: 00:30:bd:11:51:85
        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
        status: active
        inet x.x.x.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast x.x.x.255
        inet6 fe80::230:bdff:fe11:5185%rtk0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3


and doing a ftp transfer:

ftp> put 10Mtestb.rnd
local: 10Mtestb.rnd remote: 10Mtestb.rnd
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||62822|)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for '10Mtestb.rnd'.
100% |************************************************************| 10240 KB 1.18 MB/s 00:08
226 Transfer complete.
10485760 bytes sent in 00:08 (1.18 MB/s)
ftp> get 10Mtestb.rnd
local: 10Mtestb.rnd remote: 10Mtestb.rnd
229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||62809|)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for '10Mtestb.rnd' (10485760 bytes). 100% |************************************************************| 10240 KB 2.74 MB/s 00:03
226 Transfer complete.
10485760 bytes received in 00:03 (2.73 MB/s)

and the ifconfig.rtk0

cat /etc/ifconfig.rtk0
# x.x.x.3 netmask 0xffffff00 media 100baseTX-FDX
x.x.x.3 netmask 0xffffff00

(have tried both the 100BaseTX-FDX and (now) with auto.... nothing very different performance wise...)

Network load is next to nothing.....

I would expect somewhat more throughput.....

Can your disk can keep up with that? Those 2.5" driver used in old powerbooks aren't exactly fast by today's standard. If you want to measure pure network throughput use something like ttcp that doesn't hammer the disk.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR6cRs8pnzkX8Yg2nAQIrfQf/YU53coRet/1OFWkDEs6A1VhpTBWDrPCw
3rl3jI/QixvtS+b2A6W+VGzMrs8WgtkwK3HiEQ7e8SN2JzkuF4fcvgUG9RbLeiVr
tPAyKovQ+VLQ9PZWy3aykoR7LnmcnKH/Qv9w7K/zZf1j0cNgqfgU2+fgllKdPr8H
g4mzMw96dZbPgzG9pgNHLavNZfGxjhT3NzzqaM/c6Avpo2Zoua+hgXKnrR0R62J8
d55PrNxXGiufKmXBq90efQVpW4tEkEIFrn9Yhp+7PH5l7+LXkmMR7lv6A1klKE6g
dLlxSGx8fAHO0EdFMSgMVvyDFy5+BtI1K2glwfBVVWyIWulcHZCvAA==
=b02J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index