Re: Shark memory map?

To: "Jonathan A. Kollasch" <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost>
Subject: Re: Shark memory map?
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 07:48:39 -0700

> On Sep 19, 2025, at 6:46 AM, Jonathan A. Kollasch <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost> wrote:
> 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20030709053758/http://research.compaq.com/SRC/iag/info/dnaext/dnard/pal

As if CUPL wasn’t bad enough on its own, it’s C-preprocessor-preprocessed CUPL??  NEAT.  **cleans up eye bleed**

(…and way more complex than a PAL; the Mach 231 is/was a 64 macrocell CPLD from Lattice roughly equivalent to the Atmel ATF1504 that’s still available today.)

-- thorpej

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shark memory map?
  - From: Jason Thorpe

References:
- Shark memory map?
  - From: Mouse
- Re: Shark memory map?
  - From: Jonathan A. Kollasch

Prev by Date: Re: Shark memory map?
Next by Date: Re: Shark memory map?
Previous by Thread: Re: Shark memory map?
Next by Thread: Re: Shark memory map?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index