Re: NetBSD9.0: 2020-02-28-netbsd9.0-raspi-earmv6hf.img

[Jun Ebihara <jun%soum.co.jp@localhost>]

From: Harold Gutch <logix%foobar.franken.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: NetBSD9.0: 2020-02-28-netbsd9.0-raspi-earmv6hf.img
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:29:18 +0100

>> I've updated 2020-02-28-netbsd9.0-raspi-earmv6hf.img for RPI.
>> http://cdn.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/misc/jun/raspberry-pi/NetBSD-9.0/2020-02-28-netbsd9.0-raspi-earmv6hf.img.gz
>> RPI3A+: copy dtb from -current
>>  copy /boot/bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb 
> Is this really needed?  A few weeks ago I tested booting the RPI2
> kernel on an RPI 3 A+, and that worked even though I did not have a
> bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb .  I think the firmware with netbsd-9 loads
> bcm2837-rpi-3-b.dtb (or perhaps 3-b-plus.dtb) instead.

Ah,I've updated newer firmware,which need bcm2837-rpi-3-a-plus.dtb.
Back to the original on next 9.x version.

#I should delete firmware update line,when copy Makefile.NetBSD8 to NetBSD9
https://github.com/ebijun/NetBSD/blob/master/RPI/RPIimage/Image/Makefile.NetBSD9
thanx for points my mistake.

>> dmesg:
>> RPI2-1.2: 
>>  https://github.com/ebijun/NetBSD/blob/master/dmesg/earmv6hf/NetBSD9/RPI2-1.2
> Okuyama-san said that he had to build a .dtb manually for his RPI2 v1.2,
> but I don't know if that was for current or netbsd-9 - are you saying
> that you did not have to do this?  I don't have an RPI2 v1.2 yet,
> otherwise I would just test myself.

On this image (diffrent firmware from 9.0),RPI2-1.2 boot well without any tricks.
--
Jun Ebihara