Port-arm archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: acpidump and INSECURE

To: port-arm%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: acpidump and INSECURE
From: Edgar Fuß <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:58:41 +0200

> without INSECURE, securelevel is already 0 at boot.
Yes. And you can read /dev/mem at securelevel 0, no?

> I think that options INSECURE should be added to conf/GENERIC64
No.

References:
- acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
  - From: Edgar Fuß
- Re: acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
  - From: Ryo Shimizu

Prev by Date: Re: acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
Next by Date: Re: acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
Previous by Thread: Re: acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
Next by Thread: Re: acpidump and INSECURE (was: ARM64 ACPI status report 1)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index