These are my numbers on a class 10 Sony-SD-card when extracting pkgsrc.tar.
tty ld0 CPU
tin tout KB/t t/s MB/s us ni sy in id
1 130 27.20 83 2.206 1 0 4 1 93
0 132 7.333 186 1.329 0 0 0 0 100
0 45 7.839 258 1.978 0 0 1 0 98
0 44 7.134 192 1.338 0 0 1 1 97
0 44 7.806 215 1.638 0 0 0 0 99
0 44 7.483 238 1.737 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 7.250 158 1.122 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.744 255 1.932 0 0 2 1 97
0 44 6.830 169 1.129 1 0 4 0 95
0 44 7.379 201 1.448 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.702 226 1.698 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 7.391 218 1.572 0 0 0 0 100
0 45 7.161 215 1.503 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 7.164 223 1.559 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.701 192 1.445 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.600 262 1.947 0 0 1 1 97
tty ld0 CPU
tin tout KB/t t/s MB/s us ni sy in id
0 44 9.719 183 1.738 0 0 1 0 99
0 131 8.244 178 1.435 0 0 0 1 99
0 44 7.861 242 1.855 0 0 0 0 100
0 45 7.539 215 1.582 0 0 0 1 99
0 44 7.020 196 1.344 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.266 216 1.532 0 0 3 0 97
0 44 7.798 186 1.417 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 7.184 221 1.549 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.703 234 1.758 0 0 1 0 99
0 44 7.268 211 1.497 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 8.064 185 1.458 0 0 2 0 97
0 44 7.485 257 1.882 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 7.235 215 1.518 0 0 1 0 98
0 44 7.071 194 1.340 0 0 0 0 100
0 45 7.667 220 1.646 0 0 1 1 98
0 44 6.915 232 1.564 0 0 1 0 99
tty ld0 CPU
tin tout KB/t t/s MB/s us ni sy in id
0 44 7.703 180 1.356 0 0 0 1 99
0 131 6.975 240 1.632 0 0 2 0 98
Sequential write is about 6 MB/s on average.
2015-08-04 16:45 GMT+02:00 Jared McNeill <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
The autobuild server should have the changes:
http://nyftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD-daily/HEAD/201508041020Z/evbarm-earmv6hf/binary/kernel/
objcopy is used to generate "netbsd.bin" from the ELF binary. Grab netbsd-RPI.bin.gz from that
link, gunzip it, and rename to kernel.img
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Stephan wrote:
Hi Jared,
I could. Can you provide a current kernel so I don?t need to set up a build
environment beforehand?
I was also wondering what kind of file "kernel.img" (on the boot partition) is and
how to build this.
According to file, a regular NetBSD kernel is an ELF binary, whereas "kernel.img" is
just "data"?!
Regards,
Stephan
2015-08-04 14:59 GMT+02:00 Jared McNeill <jmcneill%invisible.ca@localhost>:
Hi --
I've added UHS-I support in -current and enabled it for Raspberry Pi. Can you
update and see if
this makes a difference in SD card performance?
Thanks,
Jared
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Stephan wrote:
Well, you can finde a previous discussion here:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2014/08/22/msg017539.html
The point was that creating many (even empty) files leads to a very high
kernel CPU
consumtion along with
almost no disk activity. What happens behind the scenes is still unknown to
me. One should
check whether
WAPBL makes a difference here (mount option "log" enables WAPBL journaling).
It might be
helpful to have
DTrace working in order to investigate this.
Cheers!
2015-07-09 12:33 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner <domelevo%gmail.com@localhost>:
Hallo Stephan,
Thanks for the advice: yes, you were damn right! With the dd command
you gave as example, on top of the untarring, we get very different
values:
tty ld0 CPU
tin tout KB/t t/s MB/s us ni sy in id
0 19 7.825 17 0.128 0 0 1 3 95
0 131 64.00 70 4.394 0 0 34 2 64
0 44 64.00 85 5.322 0 0 31 11 58
0 44 64.00 73 4.579 0 0 33 8 59
0 44 64.00 72 4.517 3 0 30 6 61
0 44 63.19 58 3.605 0 0 3 6 91
0 44 14.77 64 0.928 0 0 21 1 78
0 44 64.00 60 3.775 0 0 36 8 56
0 44 64.00 69 4.332 1 0 36 2 61
0 44 64.00 56 3.527 0 0 25 3 72
0 44 64.00 55 3.465 1 0 24 3 72
0 44 64.00 56 3.527 1 0 25 2 72
0 44 64.00 57 3.589 1 0 20 6 73
0 44 64.00 68 4.270 0 0 29 6 65
0 44 64.00 73 4.579 3 0 29 6 62
0 44 63.30 68 4.223 0 0 4 7 89
0 44 40.49 88 3.485 1 0 44 4 51
^C
rpi$ fg
dd if=/dev/zero of=myfile bs=4k
^C20720+0 records in
20719+0 records out
84865024 bytes transferred in 20.350 secs (4170271 bytes/sec)
So this means approximately 4MB/s, and that's indeed the nominal speed
of my microSD if it's indeed a class 4 card. Will check that once I
can switch the RPi off. Thanks!
So ffs is slow with creating files... Why is it still the standard in
NetBSD? Is the format of my partition (displayed with fstype=4.2BSD in
"disklabel /dev/ld0") also called "UFS1"? Would the format called
"UFS2" be faster regarding file creation?
And just another off-topic question sparked by this one: is there
really an added value in specifying "bs=4k"? According to the manpage,
the default is one sector, 512 bytes. When I use it (dd if=/dev/zero
of=myfile), I get 3048728 bytes/sec instead of 4170271 bytes/sec with
"bs=4k". Is that discrepancy explainable and reproducible? Thanks for
sharing your light! :)
JB
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Stephan <stephanwib%googlemail.com@localhost>
wrote:
> Can you please check the speed of sequential write (e.g. dd
if=/dev/zero
> of=myfile bs=4k)? FFS has always been slow with allocating new files,
which
> certainly contributes to the issue you?re seeing.
>
> 2015-07-09 11:28 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner
> <domelevo%gmail.com@localhost>:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm currently untarring a pkgsrc.tar.gz (48MB) to /usr. The
>> commandline I used is:
>> # nohup tar xfz pkgsrc.tar.gz -C /usr &
>>
>> so nothing is written to the stdout, it justs gunzips and untars. And
>> I have the feeling it's extremely slow. I'm running:
>> NetBSD rpi 7.0_RC1 NetBSD 7.0_RC1 (RPI.201507072130Z) evbarm
>> and it's on a RaspberryPi model B+
>>
>> The microSD card is an ADATA (32GB), I don't think it's class 10,
>> maybe class 4 (can't remove it from its slot now while the RPi is
>> running). The boot messages concerning it are:
>> ld0 at sdmmc0: <0x03:0x5344:SS32G:0x80:0x2554f92d:0x0e4>
>> ld0: 30436 MB, 7729 cyl, 128 head, 63 sec, 512 bytes/sect x 62333952
>> sectors
>> ld0: 4-bit width, bus clock 50.000 MHz
>>
>> So, while the untarring command is running, I check the speed with iostat:
>>
>> tty ld0 CPU
>> tin tout KB/t t/s MB/s us ni sy in id
>> 0 20 7.767 15 0.113 0 0 1 3 95
>> 0 131 8.194 31 0.246 0 0 3 3 94
>> 0 44 7.871 31 0.236 0 0 1 3 96
>> 0 44 7.793 29 0.219 1 0 1 2 96
>> 0 44 8.133 30 0.236 0 0 2 2 96
>> 0 44 7.871 31 0.236 0 0 1 1 98
>> 0 44 7.793 29 0.219 0 0 1 4 95
>> 0 44 7.939 33 0.253 0 0 2 1 97
>> 0 44 7.931 29 0.222 0 0 0 2 98
>> 0 44 7.571 28 0.205 0 0 6 4 90
>> 0 44 7.793 29 0.219 0 0 3 2 95
>> 0 44 8.294 34 0.273 0 0 3 5 92
>> 0 44 8.000 28 0.217 0 0 3 0 97
>> 0 44 8.067 30 0.234 0 0 0 3 97
>>
>> It's on average between 0.20 and 0.25 MB/s, don't you think it's
>> unreasonably slow? Do you have any piece of advice for me?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> JB
>
>