Re: TS 7200 kernel image size

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 08:25:59PM +1200, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> It's a bug in epsoc.c (and a number of similar files). The epsoc_print()
> function isn't testing whether or not it has been called in response to
> an error condition. As far as I can tell, epsoc_print should return the
> value "QUIET" if the parameter "name" is NULL and it shouldn't print
> anything.
> 
> This means that epclk0 is probably attached, the message just says it
> isn't. This is probably also why you get two copies of the "addr ...
> intr 35" messages. 
> 
> I guess it was only ever called for unconfigured devices in the past.

I also have new lines
WARNING: no TOD clock present
WARNING: using filesystem time
that weren't there with 3.1.1....
 Thomas