Re: Isn't the IDE-Doubler machine independent?

[Nicolas Bruno BASTIEN <lakomok%free.fr@localhost>]

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Nicolas Bruno BASTIEN wrote:
> My opinion is that you guess well. Let's keep it confined to Amiga.
> Most of other arch often have at least two IDE interfaces or can easily
> get SCSI adapter. Amiga has only one IDE interface and it is not so easy
> to have SCSI adapter (I am also thinking about BlizzardPPC SCSI that is still


"still NOT supported" is what I wanted to write, sorry

> supported) so IDE doubler, that is somehow a good thing, would be useful
> on Amiga, but on other arch ? I don't think so.
>
> I guess too that doing it as Amiga specific would be easier for NetBSD maintener
> than doing it as generic, wouldn't it ?

        

--
Nicolas Bruno BASTIEN