Port-amiga archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Pixelclock too high
Quoting Bernd Ernesti (28-Jun-00 09:50:16):
> [..]
>> However even with CV_AGGRESSIVE_TIMING, I get an pixelclock too
>> high error with modes 12 and 13. These modi work fine with AmigaOS.
>> Do I have to live with these errors? It's a pity because mode 12 is
>> the ony I would like to work with.
>>
>> Here my /etc/grfmodes:
> [..]
>> 10 100000000 1152 870 16 1152 1184 1312 1456 870 873 876
>> 915 default
>> 11 100000000 1152 900 16 1152 1184 1312 1456 900 903 906
>> 945 default
>> 12 110000000 1280 1024 16 1280 1352 1480 1688 1024 1025 1026
>> 1066 default
>> 13 108000000 1152 864 16 1152 1184 1312 1520 864 867 870
>> 909 default
>> # 24-Bit Modes.
>> 14 32000000 640 480 24 640 656 720 840 480 481 484
>> 500 default
>> 15 50000000 800 600 24 800 816 896 1056 600 601 604
>> 625 default
>> 16 53000000 1024 768 24 1024 1048 1144 1208 768 769 772
>> 789 default
>> ----- cut here -----
>>
>> Without CV_AGGRESSIVE_TIMING, I get errors with modes 10, 11, 12,
>> 13 and 16.
> Mode MHz
> (bit) without overlocking with overclocking (CV_AGGRESSIVE_TIMING)
> 8 135 135
> 15/16 80 100
> 24/32 50 55
> This are the chip limits, so even CV_AGGRESSIVE_TIMING is 25% over
> the limit for the 16bit mode.
Do I harm the CV64 in any respect (hardware wise) when I use modes
which go above this 25% increase limit? I can use these modi under
AmigaOS without any problem.
> And your mode #12 is 37.5% over the chip limit.
And mode #13 is 35% above.
TIA
--
Cu Georges Heinesch, Luxembourg
geohei%geohei.lu@localhost
http://www.geohei.lu
PGP 2.6.3i / 5.1i public key on request and on public servers
... like a virgin ...
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index