Re: successful boot report

[Staffan Thomén <duck%shangtai.net@localhost>]

On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 08:16:41AM +0300, ..I'd rather be coding ASM! wrote:
> 
> There was two versions of the 164, the LX and SX if memory serves.
> Only one of them was 'complete' enough to run VMS/Tru64, the other
> was WinNT and Linux only.

Heh, sleepy, Al? Surely you remember my machine. There are in fact three
EB164 versions, the SX, one without letters, and LX. As far as I've been able
to find out, the SX only supports lower clock cpus, while the unnamed goes up
to 500MHz and the LX can handle higher ones.. I have a fuzzy memory about there
being differences in cache size as well.
 
Staffan

-- 
Staffan Thomén - ADB3 455F 10D5 86D1 78D6  048D 11BB D66E 7C7E 2EF8