RE: please review wip/fltk13

["Larson, Timothy E." <TELarson%west.com@localhost>]

> Uhm, I didn't notice wip/fltk13 in time.

*thwap*  :)

> FLTK 1.3.0 will never be a straightforward replacement for 1.1, because
> the API has changed, to make matters worse, non detectable by the
> compiler.
> 
> So to make a smoother translation possible, I created a package
> x11/fltk13, based mostly on x11/fltk, with optional opengl support; cairo
> needs more work.
> 
> This has been used experimentally to compile dillo 3.0.1, although not yet
> in my Solaris 10 / sparc setup. fltk13 itself is building in Solaris10 as
> well as NetBSD, and passes its test target on the latter.

Earlier (July?), we'd identified packages dependent on FLTK, and some people 
were going to look at compiling against 1.3 and work with upstream for any 
porting issues, as 1.3 seems to be the official direction now.  There are not 
that many FLTK packages in pkgsrc.  I don't know where we are in that effort, 
though.  Obviously, you've worked through Dillo, which was the big one (IMHO).


Tim
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review