Re: wip/hylafax-devel 4.3.0 rc1 - please test package

[Andreas Hallmann <hallmann%wawa.ahatec.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 08:39:34AM -0700, Min Sik Kim wrote:
> On Apr 20, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Andreas Hallmann wrote:
> 
> I'm not objecting to keeping the development version of hylafax.   
> What I don't like is its PKGNAME.  See mail/mutt and mail/mutt-devel  
> for example.  Although they have different directory names, their  
> package name is "mutt".  Unless you make hylafax-devel installable  
> with hylafax (non-development version) without conflicts, you should  
> either add CONFLICTS to both packages or make them have the same  
> package name (hylafax).  I think the latter would be better.
> 
> Regards,
> Min Sik Kim
> 

I see, CONFLICTS are there for a while. 
I begged and prepared for a hylafax-devel in pkgsrc a few years ago.

So 

508: grep CONFLICTS /usr/pkgsrc/comms/hylafax/Makefile 
CONFLICTS=      hylafax-devel-[0-9]* mgetty-[0-9]*

509: grep CONFLICTS /usr/pkgsrc/wip/hylafax-devel/Makefile 
CONFLICTS=      hylafax-[0-9]* mgetty-[0-9]*

is in the packages.


I will rethink the second option, now that I understand you right.

I personally like the postfix "-devel" for packages from a development branch 
in general.
Think of it as a "you haved been warned". So a quick "pkg_info | grep -- 
-devel" 
can tell me if a system is to be considered stable and ready for prime time.
As an administrator you can have a hard time to remember the version logique of 
each and every 
package you have installed.
So IMHO flagging development versions with a '-devel' suffix is a good thing.

Even so, I understand that introducing this discipline to a large dependancy 
tree as i.e. gnome 
can be a major headache. But for leave packages like mutt or hylafax this is no 
concern.

BTW: There are some tools around like pkgdepgraph,pkg_chk etc.
     In the case of a system upgrade: are they able to determine the correct 
     pkg-directory from which the installed package i.e. mutt was build?

OK:  PKGPATH is noted in +BUILD_INFO, so they should be able to do the right 
thing.

ergo: I think I understand your point now and hope you got mine.

Regards
        Andreas
-- 
NetBSD: If you happen to have any problem with your uptime.



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review