On Apr 20, 2006, at 8:35 AM, Andreas Hallmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:05:14AM -0700, Min Sik Kim wrote:On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Andreas Hallmann wrote:HI all, I upgraded hylafax-devel to the new release-candidate.Any reason to set its pkgname to "hylafax-devel"? It seems that this package conflicts with comm/hylafax anyway, so why don't you just keep it as "hylafax"?Well, "wip/hylafax-devel" is to follow the line of development of hylafax. I.e. testing of snapshots, betas, alphas. Only of interest for hylafax developers.Therefore hylafax-devel.
I'm not objecting to keeping the development version of hylafax. What I don't like is its PKGNAME. See mail/mutt and mail/mutt-devel for example. Although they have different directory names, their package name is "mutt". Unless you make hylafax-devel installable with hylafax (non-development version) without conflicts, you should either add CONFLICTS to both packages or make them have the same package name (hylafax). I think the latter would be better.
Regards, Min Sik Kim ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review