Re: packages for review

To: David Price <dprice%cs.nmsu.edu@localhost>
Subject: Re: packages for review
From: Thomas Klausner <thomasklausner%users.sourceforge.net@localhost>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 23:28:06 +0200 See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:37:08PM -0700, David Price wrote:
>       I would like to get reviews of ...
> readseq...

The PLIST is empty.

Shouldn't this use the shar file available at
http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/soft/molbio/readseq/classic/
instead?

The HOMEPAGE is probably
        http://iubio.bio.indiana.edu/soft/molbio/readseq/

Perhaps packaging the java version too would be a good
idea.

Thanks,
 Thomas


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review

References:
- packages for review
  - From: David Price

Prev by Date: Re: please review wip/libtorrent and wip/rtorrent
Next by Date: please review wip/traceroute-nanog
Previous by Thread: Re: packages for review
Next by Thread: Re: packages for review
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index