[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

**To**:**Connor McLaughlan <cont6pro3%gmail.com@localhost>****Subject**:**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error****From**:**maya%NetBSD.org@localhost**- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 07:12:28 +0000

Hi, I see this now. It seems to be specific to sparc64 (possibly a difference because it's a 128 bit long double platform, whereas amd64 is 80 bit long double?) on amd64, _abs_c16.o does a call to cabsq (probably GCC resolves this) on sparc64, _abs_c16.o does a library call to cabsl. Interestingly, _abs_c10.o emits a call to __c99_cabsl on amd64 and everyone is happy. I will try to see if I can understand what appears to be a gfortran-specific way of emitting these library calls in gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c

**Follow-Ups**:

**References**:**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Chavdar Ivanov

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Connor McLaughlan

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Chavdar Ivanov

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Connor McLaughlan

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Chavdar Ivanov

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Connor McLaughlan

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Connor McLaughlan

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*maya

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*maya

**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error***From:*Connor McLaughlan

- Prev by Date:
**ghc90 presence issue (Re: diff from 2021-02-09 00:05 to 2021-02-10 15:43** - Next by Date:
**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error** - Previous by Thread:
**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error** - Next by Thread:
**Re: math/blas not compiling due to gcc7 error** - Indexes: